According to the Local Democracy Reporting Service, a motion formally supporting North Yorkshire Council’s objection is due to be debated by the town council on Tuesday.
The motion also calls for a “full impact assessment” about the possible effects on housing in Scarborough.
It proposes that members of the town council “continue monitoring the situation and advocate for Scarborough residents in all future discussions relating to housing, migration and community impact”.
The Home Office previously said potential use of the site would be “subject to detailed feasibility assessments, which could take several months to complete”.
Responding to the motion, Independent councillor Rich Maw, a member of Scarborough Town Council and North Yorkshire Council, said: “I have no problem with discussing important issues, but too often this administration brings forward motions that are poorly constructed, contain vague commitments or stray well beyond what a parish council can realistically deliver.
“Residents need more than political statements and intentions.
“They need properly thought-through proposals, within the council’s powers, with clear actions, responsibilities and outcomes.”
In a statement, the Home Office said: “This government is closing every asylum hotel and moving asylum seekers into alternative accommodation, including former military sites.
“We are working to fairly house asylum seekers across the country, engaging with local authorities to reduce the impact on communities.
“The numbers in asylum accommodation are now falling, with costs down by £1bn since the general election.”
